淘客熙熙

主题:裁判---2010世界杯最大一根搅屎棍 -- 四处晃荡

共:💬113 🌺129 新:
分页树展主题 · 全看首页 上页
/ 8
下页 末页
    • 家园 黑哨是世界盃的傳統!!

      62年那一屆,巴西超強,雖然黑哨下,仍能技術擊倒意大利。

      到66年那一屆。巴西最終都敵不過黑哨放任他對手的殺傷戰略而敗下陣來。至於英德決賽英國的第3 球。更是爭論的焦點。

      國際足協前會長Havelange,更坦承66及74年那兩屆的冠軍是早已決定的了。

      The 1966 World Cup held in England has been the centre of a number of conspiracy theories over the years. These include England’s quarter final victory over Argentina when the hosts won 1-0 after the South Americans had seen their captain Antonio Rattin controversially handed a straight red card for arguing with the referee.

      It has been claimed that there was a plot for England to win the World Cup, and the referee from this game was German, while the official in Germany’s quarter final win over Uruguay was English. The controversy continued in the final with Geoff Hurst’s famous ‘was it over the line?’ goal.

      Joao Havelange, who was FIFA President from 1974 until 1998 is certain to have further fuelled these conspiracy theories by openly stating that the 1966 and ’74 World Cups were fixed.

      "In the three matches that the Brazilian national team played in 1966, of the three referees and six linesmen, seven were British and two were Germans," Havelange told Folha de Sao Paulo.

      "Brazil went out, Pele ‘exited’ through injury [following some rough defensive play], and England and Germany entered into the final, just as the Englishman Sir Stanley Rous, who was the President of FIFA at the time, had wanted.

      "In Germany in 1974 the same thing happened. During the Brazil-Holland match, the referee was German, we lost 2-0 and Germany won the title," said Havelange.

      "We were the best in the world, and had the same team that had won the World Cup in 1962 in Chile and 1970 in Mexico, but it was planned for the host countries to win.”

      外链出处

    • 家园 那个犯规该吃红牌,但比赛就没悬念了

      开场才20分钟荷兰队就缺一个人的话,世界杯决赛就没有看头了。

      事实证明,荷兰队只有10个人的情况下,5分钟以后就被西班牙人破门了。

    • 家园 也不能完全这么说

      以前的比赛没有现在这么多的摄像机对着而已。

      • 家园 阿姨,借口跟不上形势了

        德容的红牌是没有任何借口的,光头近在眼前,心里不够男人而已。。。范博梅尔,他这场比赛够拿两红两黄。。。

        至于韩国人雇佣的那俩边裁,嘿嘿,您不会忘了那俩进了的球咋吹出来的吧

        无论怎样替裁判解脱,核心的问题是,目前的裁判已经无法胜任高度现代化高度商业化的足球比赛了,裁判的错误根源于FIFA的老朽,不改革无前途

        • 家园 光头下手不够狠

          尽管已经发了相当多的牌子了。荷兰是8个还是9个?西班牙好象也有4、5个。别说决赛了,整个世界杯中都极其罕见。

          估计也有领导指示:决赛别搞成最后是11对8。

          如果不搞电视裁判的话,现在这种局面还会延迟下去,最多加俩底线裁判。

          • 家园 改就比不改好

            加俩底线裁判也行啊,至少不会再有进球被冤枉

            选光头当决赛主裁,真不知道FIFA是咋琢磨的,这哥哥就差看到对踹互殴了,中场休息的时候肯定被洗脑了,下半场明显比上半场要狠

分页树展主题 · 全看首页 上页
/ 8
下页 末页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河