主题：观察：Google事件背后是怎样的博弈？ -- SkyWalkerJ

共:💬295 🌺544 🌵24 新:

没漏看

那是说，警方用这种办法抓犯人，并非永远是无懈可击的。辩方在某些情况下可以“陷阱抗辩”来对抗。

也就是说，钓鱼执法本身作为一种执法手段是被认可的，但在适用范围上有争议。

但是，即使在运用过程中发生了错误（误抓了好人），也不会像中国网民那样去指责钓鱼执法行为本身，视钓鱼执法为非法执法。

按wiki举出的例子（如下），颇有一些和上海的case类似的吧，不知怎么个“很不普通法”。比如，让未达法定年龄的人去请求某个成年人为他买酒或烟；装作卖白粉的引诱吸毒者上钩；假扮妓女去诱捕嫖客。

* Deploying a bait car (also called a honey trap) to catch an auto thief

* Setting up a seemingly vulnerable honeypot computer to lure and gain information about crackers

* Federal agents or ATF arranging someone under the legal drinking age to ask an adult to buy an alcoholic beverage or tobacco products for them.[1]

* Posing as someone who is seeking illegal drugs, contraband or child pornography to catch a supplier; or as a supplier to catch a customer.

* Posing as a child in a chat room to lure a child molester

* An undercover officer posing as a potential customer to raid illegal prostitution.

* An undercover officer posing as a prostitute to raid illegal patronage.

有趣有益，互惠互利；开阔视野，博采众长。
虚拟的网络，真实的人。天南地北客，相逢皆朋友