主题：上海反对磁悬浮的散步活动录像 -- 光禄勋

OPPOSING THE SHANGHAI MAGLEV ONSTRUCTION PLAN: 10,000 RESIDENTS TAKE PART IN THE 'HARMONIOUS WALK' NEAR PEOPLE'S SQUARE

On 12 Jan, Saturday, as agreed through signs that had been placed through the various affcted neighbourhoods, people gathered at 2pm at People's Square for the "harmonious walk". At 2pm, over 100 people had gathered by the Urban Planning Museum. There were about 30 policemen and 10 police cars. These were all normal policemen, there were no military police, no riot police. A public bus 205 was also there, and some from the crowd had already been arrested and put in it. From there to the fountain on the square, about 1,000 people were gathered around, and suddenly they began chanting slogans (nobody was leading them). They gathered in front of the fountain, in front of the municipal government building and began chanting, "Oppose the Maglev!" 30 minutes later, there was a loud-hailer that screamed, "Please leave immediately". The shocked crowd began to disperse quickly, but later they found out that it was just the fountain that was going to be turned on. Laughter broke out and they continued chanting. 10 minutes later, the police started rounding people up and people began dispersing. The police were generally quite ok, but there were one or two policemen who would be pushing people around, including the elderly, the women and the tourists. The police began dispersing people to outside the square. The bus (with the arrested guys) attempted to drive off but were stopped by the crowd. Eventually it still broke through the crowd and drove off anyway. 5 minutes later, the crowd suddenly broke through the police security lines and began running towards Xizang Lu. Most of the policemen were still near the fountain so they were unable to stop the crowd. After gathering on Xizang Lu, they began to walk south and then turned right on Yan'an Lu. Suddenly they seemed to change directions and went up the bridge, as if bypassing Yan'an Lu to walk towards Luwan District. After the bridge, they began going back towards Xizang Lu and then eastwards towards Nanjing Lu. By this time, the police cars had already been stuck on the corner of Xizang Lu and Yan'an Lu. As this was the peak period, there was no way they could make a U-turn. After breaking through the final police security barrier on Fuzhou Lu, they walked to Nanjing Lu pedestrian shopping street. There, the crowd was warmly received by other members of the public. As the crowd continued on their 'walk', they disseminated information on the maglev plan to passersby. The 'walk' ended on the junction of Nanjing Lu and Henan Lu at around 18:00. RISE UP, ENCOURAGE THE RESIDENTS OF SHANGHAI WITH REAL ACTION, SUPPORT THE CHINESE IN THEIR 'HARMONIOUS WALK' TO PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS!

　早些年第一次去台湾的时候，有台湾人对我说，一个社会太自由也弊端多多，最典型的就是城市建设。这一点我们真羡慕你们大陆，市政建设只要政府一声令下，动迁户全部迁移，工程畅通无阻，哪像我们这里，城市建设困难重重，有的钉子户十几年“钉”着不动，严重影响工程，政府也奈何他不得。

　　此话不无道理。但是，台湾同胞有所不知，我们这里的市政建设也并非一帆风顺，“钉子”也不少。而且随着时代的进步，政府的强势越来越多地与尊重民意结合起来，“一声令下”的强制动迁毕竟不是常态。而众多市民大局意识很强，自觉地服从市政建设的需要，不惜牺牲“小家”为“大家”。不过，为一项市政建设不断修正完善方案，进行公示听取意见，还是比较少见的。沪杭磁浮项目上海支线建设，大概是最典型的一例。

　　磁浮交通，就全世界而言，还是一项崭新的事业。尤其是沪杭上海支线工程，更是空前浩大，民众对此有疑虑，存在不同看法，实属正常，当然有表达自己意见和诉求的权利。而政府根据工程的实际需要和公众的意见，对方案不断进行修正，逐渐完善，也在情理之中。近来，这种相互交流、沟通、磨合、调整一直在进行中。

　　上个月，在市政府的两次例行新闻发布会上，都就此事作了说明。一次是市环保局局长张全在发布会上谈了磁浮对环境的影响，表示磁浮从环境角度看主要是两个方面，一个是噪声影响，一个是磁辐射影响。经过大量科学检测和论证，辐射方面的影响是非常小的。通过对已经建成的磁浮进行检测，3至5米过渡区域之外电磁辐射几乎完全衰减，对周边居民的影响很小。因此，市民需要科学地来认识磁浮的辐射问题。至于噪声问题，当车速达到200公里以上噪声影响非常明显，但可以通过线路优化，以及磁浮在市区限速行驶等方式予以改善。另一次发布会上，市府新闻发言人焦扬透露，目前磁浮上海机场联络线（沪杭上海支线）正在进一步深化、优化方案。她说，目前该项目的实施主体正在按照国家有关部门要求，听取有关单位、专家以及公众意见，本着尽可能利用交通走廊、适当改造市政设施、集约使用土地、降低对居民影响等原则，在线路走向、环境保护及工程设计等诸多方面进一步整体细化、优化项目的方案，完善相关工程技术措施。

　　新年伊始，市府新闻发言人焦扬再次表示，目前沪杭磁浮项目实施主体正在按照国家有关部门要求，听取有关单位、专家以及公众意见。据悉，该项目将本着尽可能利用交通走廊、适当改造市政设施、集约使用土地、降低对居民影响等原则，在线路走向、环境保护及工程设计等诸多方面进一步整体细化、优化项目的方案，完善相关工程技术措施。与此同时，沪杭磁浮上海机场联络线环境影响报告书在上海环境热线网站开始公示，该线选线调整方案(草案)也在上海城市规划网站进行公示。

　　沪杭间的磁浮项目一向是各地传媒报道的热点。而奇怪的是，对上述这些情况，各地的传媒，包括各种网站，报道甚少，有的甚至不着一辞，似乎并无此事。大概是认为这些是“官样文章”，“正面报道”吧，所以不屑一顾。而南方一家都市报，13日突然刊登了一篇相当长的报道，称“上海磁悬浮线路方案引起沿线居民争议”。大约是报道中透露了部分市民以聚会、散步的形式表达意见，所以有“看点”，于是一时间各地的传媒好像“猛醒”过来，纷纷予以转载，且标题大同小异，突出了居民的担心、不满、反对，主要集中在安全问题，即电磁辐射上。应该说，反映民众的意见无可厚非，但令人不解的是，既然要反映，就应该对此事的来龙去脉作全面、客观的报道，既表达民声，传递民意，也应有官方的态度、权威部门的声音。可惜，在这篇3000字的报道里，除了提及一位“上海市规划局有关负责人”的话之外，对上述新闻发布会上的内容未予介绍，特别是没有直接引用上海市环保局局长张全就磁浮对环境的影响问题的讲话，却对一家不公开出版的报纸上的内容大感兴趣，称“2007年1月24日，浦东新区周报在一个不显眼的版面位置，曾经刊出了一个豆腐块文章，反映磁悬浮沿线居民的身体、睡眠，甚至电视都受到了磁悬浮的影响”。而且，整篇报道字里行间所反映出来的基调，似乎是在为上海市民“抱不平”，强调的是民众担忧、怀疑，渲染的是民众对政府不满意不信任的情绪。这显然失之偏颇、有欠公允吧！

　　传媒的责任是促进矛盾的解决，为社会的和谐助力，而不是把自己的“兴趣”与“热情”投放在 “事端”和“争议”上。新闻应该有所选择，而选择表明的是传媒的新闻价值观，以及自己的立场和导向。绝对的全面、公正可能太难，可至少采访要广泛些、深入些，报道要客观些、周密些，尽量避免以偏概全，尽量科学理性----这应该是传媒人的一种普遍共识、一个行动准则吧！

南方一家都市报，13日突然刊登了一篇相当长的报道，称“上海磁悬浮线路方案引起沿线居民争议”