主题：【文摘】诸葛亮的政治表演术 -- 梦里依稀

第一，兄弟要是没读过两遍，也不敢顶老程的帖。

I believe you. The point is that many one with same opinions as you on Zhu Ge didn't do that.

They made their comment according to their impressions, not thinking after reading.

第二，诸葛亮的正面形象是史学界长期以来确立的观点，这方面有所涉猎，也不需要通读《三国志》再发言了，反其道而行之呢？

You meaning is that because:

诸葛亮的正面形象是史学界长期以来确立的观点,

therefore if anyone want to praise zhu ge, he didn't need to read 《三国志》?!

要知道这是要推翻历代历史大家的一个艰巨工程哦，不多准备些炮弹就上阵不成了义和团么？

Not so serious.

Everyone has his own opinions. For instance, about mao and zhou, many person didn't have a deep study on them, but still make comments on bbs, don't you disagree with them?

So, if someone dislikes zhu ge, and wants to make his own comment on zhu ge,

based on some material that he learned, I cannot see why you should oppose them.

If you think there's something wrong in his article, just say your opinions la.

I want to emphasize that it is NOT such a great project as 推翻.

Take it easy, Sa Su.

偏巧有的朋友理解正好相反，认为翻案文章好写，呵呵，也许也有他的道理。

My opinions on zhu ge---

First, there's not enough materials left about that period of history.

The main material is from chen shou, who is not so objective as Si Ma Qian.

Second, that period of history is not very important in the whole history of China. So I don't think it's necessary to read san guo zhi twice from beginning to the end.

I will only pick up some parts of that book for reading. You should not ask everyone to be an expert if he wants to say something which is different from tradition or what we learned in our childhood.

How many person on bbs ever read one of 24 Shi?