主题:发现程序问题的漏洞是解救任大小姐的关键 -- 龙眼

新兵营地 导读 复 39 阅 6811

全看 分页 树展 一览 主题

2018-12-10 04:30:31
4381067 复 4380889
瀚海黄沙瀚海黄沙`70387`/bbsIMG/face/0000.gif`70`7325`2548`48205`正八品上:给事郎|宣节校尉`2011-03-07 06:11:00`
有一个提出管辖权问题的美国评论,见下 4

Paul Wolf

18小时前

(已被编辑)

There is the presumption against extraterritorial application of US laws, and also the question of jurisdiction over her case. She is a Chinese citizen and anything that she did wrong, she did in China. The case has no contacts at all with the US. China should make its own extradition request, so that Ms. Wanzhou can be tried in a Chinese court. A Canadian judge considering two competing extradition requests would have to determine which country has a greater interest in the case.

Although its doubtful that violating US sanctions against Iran is a crime in China, she's also accused of making false statements on bank loan applications, which probably is. (fraud) Even if the case against her is weak, she will be badly mistreated and imprisoned for years until it's resolved.

喜欢thumb_up

回复reply

Linklink

举报flag

这个说法理说清楚了。美方指控孟欺诈违反美国的伊朗制裁案,可是孟是中国公民,该行为是在中国香港实行的,对方是香港based的英资银行。和美国与加拿大都没有连接点!连接点是国际法里非常重要的概念,也是管辖权能行使的关键。美国主张的是英资的汇丰银行被自己处罚,那是英国认可美国司法部的管辖。TMD中国认可了你美国对香港管辖了吗?认可你对中国境内中国公司的管辖了吗?还是中国认可了美国对中国境内个人的管辖了?还是中国人认可了英国认可的冲突规则对中国的管辖了?都没有!都没有,就根本没有连接点!这里是伪造一个链接点——美国因为汇丰银行的处罚,而去管辖汇丰银行的一个中国客户!


最后于2018-12-10 04:42:33改,共2次;
2018-12-10 04:30:31

全看 分页 树展 一览 主题