主题：【原创】关于戴维斯手枪被窃的补充 --- 兼给西河伯 -- 萨苏

http://www.acepilots.com/korea/george.html

空战的结果比较值得探讨，但是从此处所看到的情况看，还是认为戴维斯是被张积慧打掉，过程也很简单，戴维斯贪功了一点，而且认为张不应该有打掉他的能力，轻敌，所以倒了霉。

这里同时说明了立特菲尔德正是被张积慧“击落”的第二架F-86,只不过实际上是被击伤，而不是被击落而已。张似乎也没有用过“凌空爆炸”形容自己击落的第二架F-86,应该是记者的梦笔生花，而张的确讲过击落第二架敌机开炮比较远，这样，击伤的可能性其实更大。用韩德彩的说法，双方战绩都有水分，不过多半不是故意，而是无法和对方核对而已。

对于苏联人的宣称，这里也有讨论，并认为这也有可能，不过提出了三个要命的疑点，最后的结论还是认为张积慧是“凶手”。

同时，这里说明美中记录的战斗过程比较相似，而与苏联方面的纪录距离很大。。。 其中内容比较多而详细，老萨偷偷懒，不翻译了，反正有链接，大家自己去看吧，只把有关苏联击落的三个疑点放在这里大家看看好了。

...

This theory have 3 weak points:

1。The Russian pilots reported that Averin's victory happened over Suiho reservoir, far north from Kunu-ri, the area where both Chinese and Americans agree that Davis' death occurred.

2。The Soviet reports of this battle do not mention in any place that they were going to help the Chinese. Instead they say that Davis tried to jump a flight of Soviet MiGs, but was surprised by the flight of Leonid I. Savichev, who was flying above the previous flight and remained unnoticed by Davis. One of Savichev's wingmen was Mikhail Averin, who blasted Davis' F-86 out of the sky.

3。As we said before, Zhang Jihui and Zhiyu Shan were leader and wingman of an element, so if they would be the MiGs downed by Davis, they should have been flying together. Instead, Littlefield's personal account shows that the two MiGs jumped by Davis were the #4 of two different flights. Again, we conclude that Zhang Jihui and Zhiyu Shan WERE NOT the Davis' victims that day.