- !!!用户新注册邮件系统遭恶意攻击,暂不能发送邮件,请隔天尝试。寻求解决方案中
- 【征集】西西河的经济学,及清流措施,需要主动参与者
- 『稷下学宫』新认证方式
- 24年网站打算和努力目标
主题:【求助】打算购机,向晨大请教 -- 鸵鸟快跑
共:💬13 🌺3 新:
我也同意50D的选择。我自己是从300D直接跳到5DII,镁合金机身的感觉和塑料机身的感觉是完全不一样的。当然随之而来的重量就是要付出的代价。
对于镜头,如果预算许可的话,强烈建议上50/1.4. 同样的金属镜头和塑料镜头的感觉又是完全不同的,同时1.4头的虚化背景效果比1.8的也强很多。
外链图片需谨慎,可能会被源头改
the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens (above center), the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (above left) and the newer Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Lens (above right).
the 50mm f/1.8 lens feels like a toy. A 5-blade aperture delivers a very harsh background blur quality and flare is a problem for this lens. It delivers only adequate color compared to the two other 50s. AF is noisy and the MF ring is barely useable - there is no FTM and no distance window or markings.
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens falls in the middle of the three 50s I am discussing in many ways. It has the middle price, the middle build quality, the middle weight, the middle size ... It delivers the middle background blur quality - much better than the f/1.8 but not as good as the f/1.2.
50/1.2 则太贵了。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂【求助】打算购机,向晨大请教 鸵鸟快跑 字369 2010-07-17 19:17:47
🙂冒昧建议
🙂50/14是micro USM 喜欢喝冰茶 字48 2010-07-19 09:20:47
🙂50mm f/1.4的镜头 鸵鸟快跑 字85 2010-07-19 04:08:18
🙂如果计划上1.4, 的确没必要弄个1.8过渡 王二狗 字31 2010-07-20 21:14:19
🙂Well thought. 梦回唐朝 字151 2010-07-20 18:23:09
🙂del 鸵鸟快跑 字0 2010-07-19 04:06:31
🙂哈,多谢信任 1 晨枫 字182 2010-07-17 20:54:21