主题:【文摘】孰是孰非:微波炉与癌症 -- 非为
1,BBC报道是标题党,请仔细阅读全文,报道中人家的结果是高温会产生丙烯酰胺,与是否微波没有联系.
2.英文连接的主要论点:
1. Microwaved foods lose 60 ~ 90% of the vital-energy field and microwaving accelerates the structural disintegration of foods.
不知道这个"生命能量场"是个什么东西,至于后者,使食物结构崩溃更不知所云.
2. Microwaving creates cancer-causing agents within milk and cereals.
什么东西,也没说
3. Microwaving alters elemental food-substances, causing digestive disorders.
4. Microwaving alters food chemistry which can lead to malfunctions in the lymphatic system and degeneration of the body's ability to protect itself against cancerous growths.
5. Microwaved foods lead to a higher percentage of cancerous cells in the bloodstream.
6. Microwaving altered the breakdown of elemental substances when raw, cooked, or frozen vegetables were exposed for even a very short time and free radicals were formed.
7. Microwaved foods caused stomach and intestinal cancerous growths, a general degeneration of peripheral cellular tissues, and a gradual breakdown of the digestive and excretive systems in a statistically high percentage of people.
8. Microwaved foods lowered the body's ability of the body to utilize B-complex vitamins, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, essential minerals and lipotropics.
9. The microwave field next to a microwave oven caused a slew of health problems as well.
懒得驳了,和那"洪博士"的文章一路货色,耸人听闻的词汇和来源不详的数据.
你回帖中的文章
1
和洪的话如出一辙
在美国癌症也比其它国家领先,高居第一位。为保护大众利益作研究的团体几乎没有,都是为大公司牟利而研究。
2 ,是摘录的NEXUS Magazine的文章,外链出处
它的自我介绍
这两篇货色也能算论文?
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 2 层
🙂那个英文链接和BBC的报道都是反方的论点 非为 字313 2009-05-24 19:49:57
🙂麻烦翻译一下 lunan 字21 2009-05-30 17:11:23
🙂基本上跟主帖中前两篇文章一样的观点和依据,所以就没翻 非为 字0 2009-05-30 17:13:57
🙂回复
🙂送花 弄花满衣 字142 2009-05-28 01:16:33
🙂这两篇论文可是用google scholar搜出来的 1 非为 字90 2009-05-25 06:24:07
🙂那是你和别人打嘴仗的事 1 苏迅 字68 2009-05-25 17:03:38
🙂还真没兴趣为了打嘴仗而打嘴仗 非为 字144 2009-05-25 19:21:18